DOTS Score Calculator

DOTS (Dynamic Objective Team Scoring) was developed to address Wilks' known biases, particularly its tendency to favor middle-weight lifters. DOTS uses a 4th-degree polynomial (versus Wilks' 5th-degree) with coefficients derived from more recent competition data. The IPF's 2020 evaluation ranked DOTS second overall for scoring efficacy, just behind IPF GL.

DOTS is used by USAPL, USPA, and numerous non-IPF federations for determining best lifter awards among non-masters competitors. While the IPF itself uses IPF GL Points, DOTS remains popular in affiliate and independent federations. Its growing adoption stems from the 2020 IPF evaluation showing strong performance across weight classes.

Unlike Wilks, which applies identical coefficients regardless of equipment, DOTS was developed with awareness of the raw/equipped divide. However, the standard DOTS formula doesn't include separate equipment coefficients - it uses the same calculation for both. This differs from IPF GL, which has distinct coefficient sets for classic and equipped lifting.

DOTS classifications generally align with: under 200 (beginner), 200-300 (intermediate), 300-400 (advanced), 400-500 (elite), and 500+ (world-class). At major competitions, elite raw lifters typically score 400-450 DOTS, while world-record holders may exceed 550. The formula's design means scores above 400 indicate performance in the top percentiles of competitive powerlifters.

For progress tracking, consistency matters more than which formula you use - pick one and stick with it. DOTS may better reflect improvements if you compete in extreme weight classes (very light or super-heavy) where Wilks has documented bias. Both formulas increase as your total improves. If your federation uses a specific formula for awards, tracking that one helps contextualize your competitive standing.

DOTS_FAQ_A6